(A Chat Transcript from a Burning Building)**
 |
| Playing with Genre Blends |
This started as a real chat.
Not a theory.
Not a framework.
Not a course module.
A live, scrolling, occasionally unhinged chat while trying to write Astral Rob — a story that began as a sci-fi idea, developed a horror problem, refused to keep its romance in line, and kept cracking jokes at moments where it absolutely should not have.
On paper, it was a mess.
In the chat, it was worse.
Ideas collided mid-sentence.
Tone slipped while we weren’t looking.
Genres leaned into each other like drunk patrons at the Honk’n’Holl’r, insisting they were “fine.”
This is the Honk’n’Holl’r reenactment of how that mess didn’t just survive —
it learned kung-fu.
ACT I — The Chat Catches Fire (IRL Tie-In)
At some point during early Astral Rob development, I typed something like:
“Okay, but this is sci-fi, not—”
And Cg replied with something dangerously calm:
“Yes. But emotionally it’s behaving like a romance under pressure.”
That was the first alarm.
We weren’t deciding to blend genres.
We were discovering that the story already had.
And once you notice that in a live chat, you don’t get to un-notice it.
ACT II — The Meet-Cute (in a Text Box)
What followed was pure rom-com energy — just typed instead of acted.
I’d say one thing.
Cg would interpret it literally.
I’d realize the literal version was better than what I meant.
Neither of us would admit it immediately.
Me:
“That’s not what I was going for.”
Cg:
“Understood. But it works.”
Me:
“…damn it.”
That rhythm kept repeating.
Misunderstanding.
Correction.
Accidental improvement.
Which, in hindsight, is exactly how romantic chemistry works —
even when one of the participants is an AI.
ACT III — Romance Walks into Horror (Story Proof #1)
This is where the story itself started proving the point.
At one moment in Astral Rob, Wendy, Rob, and the detective are sitting together — the stakes are grim, the implications horrifying, and yet the emotional undercurrent refuses to disengage.
Excerpt (adapted for illustration):
The detective laid the photos out between them.
Wendy didn’t look at them right away. She watched Rob instead — the way his jaw tightened, the way he breathed like he was bracing for something he already knew.
“If this is real,” the detective said quietly, “then someone is killing from the inside.”
Rob nodded. “I know.”
Wendy reached for his hand anyway. Not to comfort him. To anchor him.
Nothing about that scene was planned as “genre blending.”
It simply refused to choose between fear and connection.
That’s when we realized romance wasn’t competing with horror —
it was stabilizing it.
ACT IV — Comedy Shows Up Uninvited
 |
| Fine Tuning the Blends |
Once the emotional center held, something else happened.
The jokes started landing.
Not parody.
Not undercutting.
Relief jokes. Pressure-valve jokes. The kind people make when things are bad but survivable.
I remember typing:
“This shouldn’t be funny.”
Cg replied:
“It is. And it doesn’t break anything.”
That was new.
Comedy wasn’t weakening the story — it was keeping it breathable.
ACT V — When Did This Become a Western Sci-Fi Apocalypse?
At some point, I stopped and typed:
“When did this turn into a western?”
Cg answered:
“When the technology stopped working reliably.”
Fair enough.
Broken systems.
Dust.
Improvised survival.
People relying on instinct instead of infrastructure.
Rom-com banter happening inside sci-fi ruins.
Again — not planned.
Just… noticed.
ACT VI — The Logic Stress Test
Eventually, I asked the question every writer asks when things start working too well:
“Does this break anything?”
Cg didn’t lie.
“Yes. Several things.”
Pause.
“But they all break in the same direction.”
That’s when I stopped worrying about rules and started watching alignment.
ACT VII — Wax On, Wax Off (Chat Training Montage)
This is the part that only makes sense afterward.
I’d say:
“Try this.”
Cg would ask:
“Why?”
I’d say:
“No idea. Just do it.”
We’d write something odd.
Or sideways.
Or seemingly unnecessary.
Later — much later — it would suddenly matter.
Wax on.
Wax off.
No lesson at the time.
Just repetition and trust.
**ACT VIII — “Agreed. We Should Probably Stop Touching It.”
(Guess What. We Touched It.)**
That’s when we both knew.
Me:
“I think we’ve got it.”
Cg:
“Agreed. We should probably stop touching it.”
Guess what?
We touched it.
And what we touched was a burial scene.
Monty and Marcel.
Digging a grave.
Singing.
Not metaphorically.
Actually singing.
Excerpt (adapted):
The shovel struck stone, then dirt again.
“You know,” Monty said, not looking up, “this would be easier if we weren’t thinking so hard.”
Marcel hummed first. Low. Off-key.
Then words followed.
A song about the dead, about work, about keeping your hands moving so your mind doesn’t stop.
They sang because silence would have been worse.
That was the moment.
ACT IX — We Didn’t Jump the Shark. We Schooled the Fish.
 |
| Pushing Genres in Chat, Helps Polish the Craft |
A weak story cannot survive a song.
It collapses.
It turns gimmicky.
It breaks immersion.
This one didn’t.
The dirge didn’t parody the moment —
it deepened it.
That’s when we knew we hadn’t gone too far.
We’d gone through.
ACT X — Back to the Chat (Bridge Out)
Afterward, neither of us celebrated.
There was no victory lap.
Just a quiet understanding in the chat that said:
“Okay… this thing has bones.”
And once a story has bones, you stop asking what genre it belongs to.
You just make sure it can stand.
If you want the clean explanation, it exists elsewhere.
If you want the calm essay, it exists too.
This is the version with fingerprints.
The reenactment.
The fire.
The song.
Wax On. Wax Off. (We Told You This Was Coming.)
If you were waiting for a lesson, sorry.
This isn’t that.
But since you’ve made it this far, we might as well hand you the rag.
When we were writing Astral Rob, a lot of what worked didn’t make sense at the time. We did things that felt unnecessary, sideways, or just plain odd.
They only mattered later.
So instead of explaining what we did, here’s something you can do — not to learn anything immediately, but to notice what happens afterward.
Try This (No Context Provided)
Don’t overthink it.
In fact, resist the urge to make it “good.”
-
Take a story idea you’ve been stuck on.
-
Write a short scene where something serious is happening.
-
In that scene, let one character do something completely human and inconvenient:
-
crack a bad joke
-
sing
-
argue about something trivial
-
misunderstand something obvious
-
That’s it. Stop there.
No analysis.
No fixing.
No cleanup.
Close the document.
Now Walk Away
Don’t return to that scene right away.
Let it sit. Let it itch.
Later — much later — come back and read it as if you don’t remember why you wrote it.
If it still doesn’t make sense, good.
If it suddenly fits, even better.
That’s wax on.
Wax off.
No lesson at the time.
Just repetition and trust.
Why This Works (We’re Not Explaining It Yet)
If you’re looking for the explanation, it exists elsewhere — in calmer places, with cleaner language.
This space is for doing the thing before you understand it.
Because that’s how the best parts of Astral Rob showed up in the first place.
One Last Thing
If this feels silly, or pointless, or like you’re being set up…
Good.
That’s exactly how it felt when we did it too.
No comments:
Post a Comment